Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] compat/mingw: allow sigaction(SIGCHLD)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/06/2025 09:53, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón via GitGitGadget wrote:
From: =?UTF-8?q?Carlo=20Marcelo=20Arenas=20Bel=C3=B3n?= <carenas@xxxxxxxxx>

A future change will start using sigaction to setup a SIGCHLD signal
handler.

The current code uses signal() which returns SIG_ERR (but doesn't
seem to set errno) so instruct sigaction() to do the same.

Why are we returning -1 below instead of SIG_ERR if we want the behavior to match?

Thanks

Phillip


Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  compat/mingw-posix.h | 1 +
  compat/mingw.c       | 4 +++-
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/compat/mingw-posix.h b/compat/mingw-posix.h
index a0dca756d104..847d558c9b2d 100644
--- a/compat/mingw-posix.h
+++ b/compat/mingw-posix.h
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct sigaction {
  	sig_handler_t sa_handler;
  	unsigned sa_flags;
  };
+#define SA_NOCLDSTOP 1
struct itimerval {
  	struct timeval it_value, it_interval;
diff --git a/compat/mingw.c b/compat/mingw.c
index 8a9972a1ca19..5d69ae32f4b9 100644
--- a/compat/mingw.c
+++ b/compat/mingw.c
@@ -2561,7 +2561,9 @@ int setitimer(int type UNUSED, struct itimerval *in, struct itimerval *out)
int sigaction(int sig, struct sigaction *in, struct sigaction *out)
  {
-	if (sig != SIGALRM)
+	if (sig == SIGCHLD)
+		return -1;
+	else if (sig != SIGALRM)
  		return errno = EINVAL,
  			error("sigaction only implemented for SIGALRM");
  	if (out)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux