On Thursday, 19 June 2025 03:24:03 CEST Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Jean-Noël Avila via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > -A special notation "'<commit1>'..'<commit2>'" can be used as a > > -short-hand for "^'<commit1>' '<commit2>'". For example, either of > > +A special notation "`<commit1>..<commit2>`" can be used as a > > +short-hand for "`^<commit1> <commit2>`". For example, either of > > It didn't look like there are huge differences in the rendered > output with this change (and the below hunk) ... > > > the following may be used interchangeably: > > > > ifdef::git-rev-list[] > > > > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ $ git log HEAD ^origin > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > endif::git-log[] > > > > -Another special notation is "'<commit1>'...'<commit2>'" which is useful > > +Another special notation is "`<commit1>...<commit2>`" which is useful > > ... or without, but semantically the updated one of course is more > correct ;-) I have a special setup where bold and italic are rendered as colors in the manpages, red for bold, green for italic. The dots turn red with this change.
