Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This v4 is just about fixing a few bugs in the tests using the SHA-256 > object format compared to the v3. (I had issues with CI tests on v3, > so I sent it without waiting for the results.) Thanks. I am not sure if "I am happy is either 1 or 256" is what you really want, though. The test presumably knows what algorithm is being used during its run, so wouldn't you want to say more like "I know I used sha256, and I expect seeing sha256, ah, I see sha256 and even better I see no sha1, so I am very happy"? > There are no tests in this v4 and in v3 with both a SHA-1 and a > SHA-256 signature on the same commit though, as I am not sure yet how > to best generate a commit with such signatures. Suggestions welcome! Good point to fill potential gaps. If we had such a commit, then would these tests say "I know I want both 1 and 256, and I do see one instance each of 1 and 256, so I am happy"?