On 2025-06-11 at 11:31:19, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote: > I only bring up this minor point since I read that there will be a next > version anyway. I was just about to send it out, so I'm glad I saw this before doing so. > On Mon, Jun 2, 2025, at 00:32, brian m. carlson wrote: > > +--print:: > > + This option is only valid for `export`. > > ++ > > +Create the chain of commits representing the exported stashes without > > +storing it anywhere in the ref namespace and print the object ID to > > +standard output. This is designed for scripts. > > + > > +--to-ref:: > > + This option is only valid for `export`. > > ++ > > The existing options say “for [the] `<cmd>` command”. So that’s a minor > deviation from the convention. I can change that here. I'll use "for the `<cmd>` command`" because I think it reads better with the article than without, even though that's a little less consistent. -- brian m. carlson (they/them) Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
