On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 00:11, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Phillip Wood (2): > > stash: allow "git stash -p <pathspec>" to assume push again > > stash: allow "git stash [<options>] --patch <pathspec>" to assume push > > Are other people interested in this work? I haven't seen any > comments other than a few nitpicky one form mine, and want to (1) > gauge the interest in the fix, and (2) see how well reviewed it is > (and my review or reading over the patches again would not count all > that much here). On reading the patches, I realized that I have some interest in this. I left some comments. Most of them amount to thinking out loud, but I do think that the new test could do a bit better at proving that the (fixed/improved) implementation actually ends up picking up `-p` at all. A nice, pleasant read. The series has a well-defined focus. Martin
