Re: [PATCH 1/2] contrib/subtree: parse using --stuck-long

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 4:42 PM D. Ben Knoble <ben.knoble@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 12:41 PM Patrik Weiskircher via GitGitGadget
> <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Patrik Weiskircher <patrik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > -S/--gpg-sign requires an optional parameter. Optional parameter
> > handling only works unambiguous with git rev-parse --parseopt when using
> > the --stuck-long option.
>
> Here we mention "-S", but that flag isn't implemented yet, right?
>
> Perhaps something like:
>
>     Optional parameter handling only works unambiguous with git rev-parse
>     --parseopt when using the --stuck-long option. To prepare for future commits
>     which add flags with optional parameters, parse with --stuck-long.
>

Makes sense! Changing that. What is a good policy to resubmit
something? Should I wait longer? Sorry, very new here!





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux