Hi Junio, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Collin Funk <collin.funk1@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> + When documenting multiple related `git config` variables, place them on >> + a separate line instead of separating them by commas. For example: >> + core.var1:: >> + core.var2:: >> + This is a description of 'core.var1' and 'core.var2'. > > As `core.varN` in the above example are all what the end-user would > give literally, just like `git config` command name in the first > sentence, they should be marked up as literal strings, i.e. > > ... For example, do not write this: > > `core.var1`, `core.var2`:: > Description common to `core.var1` and `core.var2`. > > Instead write this: > > `core.var1`:: > `core.var2`:: > Description common to `core.var1` and `core.var2`. This markup is different than what is used in Documentation/config/*.adoc though. Here is just one example: $ head -n 3 Documentation/config/core.adoc core.fileMode:: Tells Git if the executable bit of files in the working tree is to be honored. That was my reasoning for writing it how I did in the patch. Are you saying that all of these should be changed? I do not have any experience with AsciiDoc so I am not sure if that is correct. >> +This format is required for the `generate-configlist.sh` script to >> +properly generate "config-list.h". > > It is not wrong per-se, but this tempts people to "fix" the > generate-configlist.sh script so that it can grok the comma > separated list "again". And when that fix is done and reviewed > carelessly, we'd again break some implementations of sed the same > way and we will come back full circle ;-) > [...] > we explained that the reason why we want to do so is because it is > easier to "grep". Does this "do not comma-list variables, but list > them one per line" also give us better greppability, and if so we > want to explain that way, perhaps? > > $ git grep '`core\.var1`::' Documentation/config/ Yes, that is a good side affect of the change that can be documented. I will send V2 after clarification on the other point. Collin