[PATCH v5 2/3] pack-bitmap: reword comments in test_bitmap_commits()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Lidong Yan <502024330056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In pack-bitmap.c:test_bitmap_commits(), it comments

    /*
     * As this function is only used to print bitmap selected
     * commits, we don't have to read the commit table.
     */

This suggests that we can avoid reading the commit table altogether.
However, this comment is misleading. The reason we load bitmap entries here
is because test_bitmap_commits() needs to print the commit IDs from the
bitmap, and we must read the bitmap entries to obtain those commit IDs.
So reword this comment.

Signed-off-by: Lidong Yan <502024330056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 pack-bitmap.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pack-bitmap.c b/pack-bitmap.c
index fd19c2255163..e514c9da239b 100644
--- a/pack-bitmap.c
+++ b/pack-bitmap.c
@@ -2839,8 +2839,9 @@ int test_bitmap_commits(struct repository *r)
 		die(_("failed to load bitmap indexes"));
 
 	/*
-	 * As this function is only used to print bitmap selected
-	 * commits, we don't have to read the commit table.
+	 * Since this function needs to print bitmap selected
+	 * commits, bypass the commit lookup table (if one exists)
+	 * by forcing the bitmap to eagerly load its entries.
 	 */
 	if (bitmap_git->table_lookup) {
 		if (load_bitmap_entries_v1(bitmap_git) < 0)
-- 
gitgitgadget





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux