Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] builtin/gc: use designated field initializers for maintenance tasks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

> Convert the array of maintenance tasks to use designated field
> initializers. This makes it easier to add more fields to the struct
> without having to modify all tasks.
>

I was wondering why we don't catch missing field initializers when not
using designators. Seems like we explicitly set
'-Wno-missing-field-initializers'. Perhaps something to slowly tackle
over time.

The patch looks good.

[snip]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux