Re: [PATCH v10 6/9] imap-send: fix numerous spelling and grammar mistakes in logs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 01/06/25 12:58 pm, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 3:12 AM Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> A lot of spelling and grammar mistakes were found in the logs shown to
>> the user while using imap-send. Most of them are lack of a full stop at
>> the end of a sentence and first word of a sentence not being capitalized.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/imap-send.c b/imap-send.c
>> @@ -249,9 +249,9 @@ static int verify_hostname(X509 *cert, const char *hostname)
>>         if (!(subj = X509_get_subject_name(cert)))
>> -               return error("cannot get certificate subject");
>> +               return error("Cannot get certificate subject");
>>         if ((len = X509_NAME_get_text_by_NID(subj, NID_commonName, cname, sizeof(cname))) < 0)
>> -               return error("cannot get certificate common name");
>> +               return error("Cannot get certificate common name");
> 
> This patch generally seems to be taking the code in a direction
> opposite the rest of the project. Quoting from
> Documentation/CodingGuidelines:
> 
>   Error Messages
> 
>    - Do not end a single-sentence error message with a full stop.
> 
>    - Do not capitalize the first word, only because it is the first
>      word in the message ("unable to open '%s'", not "Unable to open
>      '%s'"). But "SHA-3 not supported" is fine, because the reason the
>      first word is capitalized is not because it is at the beginning
>      of the sentence, but because the word would be spelled in capital
>      letters even when it appeared in the middle of the sentence.
> 
>> @@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ static int auth_cram_md5(struct imap_store *ctx, const char *prompt)
>>         if (ret != strlen(response)) {
>>                 free(response);
>> -               return error("IMAP error: sending response failed");
>> +               return error("IMAP error: sending CRAM-MD5 response failed");
>>         }
> 
> Providing more context in the error message, as done here, seems welcome.

Hmm, ok




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux