Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@xxxxxxxx> writes: >>> -When `--compose` is used, git send-email will use the From, To, Cc, Bcc, >>> -Subject, Reply-To, and In-Reply-To headers specified in the message. If >>> -the body of the message (what you type after the headers and a blank >>> -line) only contains blank (or Git: prefixed) lines, the summary won't be >>> +When `--compose` is used, `git send-email` will use the 'From', 'To', 'Cc', >>> +'Bcc', 'Subject', 'Reply-To', and 'In-Reply-To' headers specified in the >>> +message. If the body of the message (what you type after the headers and a >>> +blank line) only contains blank (or Git: prefixed) lines, the summary won't be >> >> Shouldn't 'Git:' in "or Git: prefixed" be marked-up somehow as well? >> >> As these mail header names are all literal parts, shouldn't ehy be >> marked up like `To`, `Cc`, etc.? > > I think its ok to let these remain in '', and deviate from the rules a bit. > If backticks are used, it will be a mess when rendered on the website. I do not think I agree; bending the rule only because the density of literals in a single paragraph is too heavy does not sound like a good application of a rule---it is hard to justify such an exception. >>> - by 'c_rehash', or a single file containing one or more PEM format >>> - certificates concatenated together: see verify(1) -CAfile and >>> - -CApath for more information on these). Set it to an empty string >>> + by `c_rehash`, or a single file containing one or more PEM format >>> + certificates concatenated together). Set it to an empty string >> >> What is this change about? grammatical errors? non existent links? >> cpan links? It does not look any of these. > > Non existing links. Checkout the website. But I do not see any link in ... >>> - by 'c_rehash', or a single file containing one or more PEM format >>> - certificates concatenated together: see verify(1) -CAfile and >>> - -CApath for more information on these). Set it to an empty string ... the text that was removed. The reference to verify(1) is a command in the OpenSSL suite, right?
