> > This singles out identifiers. Every single other characters would be its > > own word. I'd consider this a disimprovement. If you are not prepared to > > provide worddiff patterns, I recommend to use "[^ \t]+", which roughly > > amounts to the default behavior. It can be improved incrementally in > > later patches. > > Good point. Thanks for the remark. I'll change to this approach in v2 > > Please squash the test cases into this patch. Don't forget to test an > > indented function, and while at it, test a function definition *nested* > > in a function definition: that documents what the expected outcome is. > > Again, good point. Sure, that is an important feature that a userdiff driver should address. Thanks again
