On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 09:03:55AM -0700, Jon Forrest wrote: > The documentation clearly says that running "git commit -a" > doesn't add new files to the index. I wonder why that choice > was made. I use `git commit -a` all the time in workspaces that are dirty. It would be exceedingly annoying if `git commit -a` were to act like `git add . && git commit`. > Would the addition of "git commit -A" (note the capital letter) > that works the same as "git commit -a", except that new files > are also added be something you'd consider? [Not being part of the team I can't answer this. But as a user I wouldn't mind, and I would almost never use it.] Nico --
