Re: [PATCH] t: remove unexpected SANITIZE_LEAK variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 02:06:26AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> As a side note, we do still use the SANITIZE_LEAK prereq in a few
> places, and I believe that it does actually work. It might be nice to
> clean up any leaks in those few spots, though we probably want to keep
> the prereq around forever (e.g., if you introduce a test which shows off
> a leak and then fixes it later). All orthogonal to your patch, though,
> which looks good to me.

Ah, nevermind. These are all due to 8415595203 (t5601: work around leak
sanitizer issue, 2024-11-20). They are leak-free (and the tests pass on
my system), but apparently some upstream bug can cause issues.

-Peff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux