Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] align the behavior when opening "packed-refs"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 09:31:09AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Change in v5:
> >
> > 1. Improve the commit message in the first patch to be more clear:
> >     1. Talk about the current behavior, what error we would report if
> >        "packed-refs" is empty.
> >     2. To align with the runtime behavior, we should skip checking the
> >        content of "packed-refs".
> >     3. Why do we need to report to the user when the "packed-refs" is
> >        empty
> > 2. Fix grammar issue in the last patch.
> 
> The thread has gone quiet on this topic.  Is everybody happy with
> this version?

Yep, it looks good to me. Thanks.

-Peff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux