kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > 46538012d94 (notes remove: --stdin reads from the standard input, > 2011-05-18) added `--stdin` for the `remove` subcommand, documenting it > in the “Options” section. But `copy --stdin` was added before that, in > 160baa0d9cb (notes: implement 'git notes copy --stdin', 2010-03-12). > > Treat this option equally between the two subcommands: > > • remove: mention `--stdin` on the subcommand as well, like for `copy` > • copy: mention it as well under the option documentation > > Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/git-notes.adoc | 10 +++++++--- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-notes.adoc b/Documentation/git-notes.adoc > index d2d7dac8d41..1542850eaaa 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-notes.adoc > +++ b/Documentation/git-notes.adoc > @@ -127,6 +127,10 @@ When done, the user can either finalize the merge with > giving zero or one object from the command line, this is > equivalent to specifying an empty note message to > the `edit` subcommand. > ++ > +In `--stdin` mode, also remove the object names given on standard > +input. In other words, `--stdin` can be combined with object names from > +the command line. > > `prune`:: > Remove all notes for non-existing/unreachable objects. > @@ -208,9 +212,9 @@ See `core.commentChar` in linkgit:git-config[1]. > object that does not have notes attached to it. > > `--stdin`:: > - Also read the object names to remove notes from the standard > - input (there is no reason you cannot combine this with object > - names from the command line). The original was really bad, especially if it ignored the fact that the 'copy' action also took the option. > + For `remove` and `copy`. See the respective subcommands. This > + option can be combined with object names given via the command > + line for `remove`. However, this is not the case for `copy`. During my first read of this paragraph, I somehow read the first two sentences as "if you want to learn how this option behaves with the remove and copy subcommands, go read the documentation for these subcommands", making me anticipate that the remainder of the paragraph would talks about what happens when --stdin is given to other subcommands. Apparently that is not what is going on. It may be simpler to just say Only valid for `remove` and `copy`. See the respective subcommands. and stop there.
