Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] packed-backend: fsck should allow an empty "packed-refs" file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 10:18:34AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > It may be useful for fsck to detect this, though, even if the default
> > message severity is set to "info" or even "ignore. That would allow
> > people who know they are using modern Git to increase it themselves (I
> > don't expect normal users to do this, but it would probably be useful
> > for forges which run automated "fsck" across a lot of repos).
> >
> > And then the backwards-incompatible Git 3.0 thing would just be tweaking
> > the severity of the config (and in the meantime, it would help flush out
> > any unexpected instances people run into).
> 
> I came to make a same comment but the above has everything I wanted
> to say (and more).

Yup, agreed, that sounds like a reasonable approach indeed.

Patrick




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux