Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] object-store: carve out the object database subsystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/9/2025 5:43 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> Changes in v2:
>>   - Fix for a copy-and-pasted commit message.
>>   - Rename `struct odb_backend` to `struct odb_alternate`. I'm happy to
>>     revert to the previous name if we ultimately think it's the better
>>     suited one.
> 
> Diff between the previous iteration is quite noisy due to this; I do
> not have strong opinion for or against either name myself.

I agree the range-diff is noisy, so I had to reread the patches.

Thankfully, the patch organization was already pretty good, so
it was quick to validate that my earlier concerns were handled. 
>>   - A couple of fixes to move changes into the correct commit. `git
>>     rebase -x 'meson compile -C build'` is now clean.
> 
> Good to see that we care about bisectability.
> 
>>   - I _didn't_ back out the rename to "odb.{c,h}". Junio has already
>>     fixed the fallout, so it's probably more work for him to kick it out
>>     again than to just leave it in.
> 
> You do not have to make me an excuse, if popular demand is not to
> rename; I can cope with either one fine.
I'm happy that you considered my advice as necessary.

Since the rename doesn't appear to have huge implications for
ongoing series, I won't voice any further objections to this
rename.

v2 LGTM.

Thanks,
-Stolee





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux