On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 05:42:08AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I noticed because I have a patch series from last summer tightening > > these rules (it got derailed by some conflicting work, and I've been > > meaning to pick it back up). I can certainly adjust these tests as part > > of that series, but if you're re-rolling anyway, it might be nice to do > > it now. > > True, and exported one is a sort-of-normal-looking isolated history, > so it does not have any strong reason to be at the top level. But I > am curious what your plans are to deal with .git/refs/stash itself? My series is only about the absolute top-level, outside of refs/. So "refs/stash" is OK, but "stash" is not. -Peff
