Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 5/6/25 7:09 AM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > >> Instead, rename the structure to `object_database`. This term is already >> used a lot throughout our codebase, and it cannot easily be mistaken for >> "object directories", either. Furthermore, its acronym ODB is already >> well-known and works well as part of a function's name, like for example >> `odb_has_object()`. > > The patch is the kind where "it's correct if and only if it compiles," > which is good! Yes, unless there are topics in flight that adds more uses independently; I think there weren't any, though, which is good.
