On 06/05/2025 11:39, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 11:44:08AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: Or perhaps we pick a single representative job and only after it passes start other jobs? None of the tweaks along these lines I can think of feel satisfying to me.Wouldn't that only mean that the pipeline takes even longer from start to finish? Even if the representative job succeeds it doesn't tell me anything about whether there are leaks, or whether it works on Windows, or on macOS. But given that I am on Linux, I especially care about jobs that use a platform different than my own and always wait for them to finish before sending out a patch series to the mailing list.
I did wonder if it is possible to make a failing job kill/cancel all the other jobs but I think we have a few flaky tests that occasionally randomly fail which complicates things.
Best Wishes Phillip
Patrick
