On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 08:27:16AM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 10:58, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 06:53:02PM +0100, Seyi Kuforiji wrote:
> > > diff --git a/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h b/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h
> > > index e4c360fa7e..2958db5dc0 100644
> > > --- a/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h
> > > +++ b/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h
> > > @@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
> > >
> > > struct reftable_buf;
> > >
> > > -void t_reftable_set_hash(uint8_t *p, int i, enum reftable_hash id);
> > > +void cl_reftable_set_hash(uint8_t *p, int i, enum reftable_hash id);
> > >
> > > -struct reftable_writer *t_reftable_strbuf_writer(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> > > +struct reftable_writer *cl_reftable_strbuf_writer(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> > > struct reftable_write_options *opts);
> > >
> > > -void t_reftable_write_to_buf(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> > > +void cl_reftable_write_to_buf(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> > > struct reftable_ref_record *refs,
> > > size_t nrecords,
> > > struct reftable_log_record *logs,
> >
> > It is quite weird that we declare the replacement functions in
> > "unit-test.h" in the first commit only to remove them at a later point.
> > It would make way more sense if we introduced the functions in
> > "t/unit/lib-reftable.{c,h}" right from the start and then only remove
> > the unused functions in the last step.
> >
> > Patrick
>
> If I get it correctly, you're suggesting I have both the original
> functions and the clar-based variant in `t/unit/lib-reftable.{c,h}`
Yup, exactly.
Patrick
