On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 05:58:12PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The documentation of "git whatchanged" is pretty explicit that this > has retained for historical reasons to help those whose fingers I feel like there's a word missing here. Maybe "that this command has been retained"? > cannot be retrained. Let's see if they still are finding it hard to > type "git log --raw" instead of "git whatchanged" by marking the > command as "nominated for removal", and require "--i-still-use-this" > on the command line. Adjust the tests so that the option is passed > when we invoke the command. In addition, we test that the command > fails when "--i-still-use-this" is not given. > > While at it, update the documentation page to use the new [synopsis] > facility to mark-up the SYNOPSIS part. This while-at-it change feels a bit funny given that we don't touch the docs at all, but I don't mind it too much. Patrick
