On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 03:09:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 07:53:54AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > The script generates a Message-ID alongwith the other headers when
> > gen_header is called, and is sent alongwith the email. For most email
> > providers, including gmail, the Message-ID goes unchanged to the
> > recipient.
> >
> > But, this does not seem to be a case with Outlook. In Outlook, when we
> > send our own Message-ID as a part of the headers, it discards it. Then
> > it generates a new random Message-ID and that is what the recipient
> > gets.
> >
> > This is a problem because the Message-ID is crucial when we are sending
> > multiple emails in a thread. The current implementation for threads in
> > the script replies to the Message-ID it generated, but due to Outlook's
> > behavior, it is not the same as the one that the recipient got, thus
> > breaking threads. So a need arises to retrieve the Message-ID from the
> > server response and set it in the In-Reply-To and References email
> > headers instead of using the self generated one for the purpose of
> > replies.
> >
> > The $smtp->message variable in this script for outlook is something like
> > this:
> >
> > 2.0.0 OK <Message-ID> [Hostname=Some-hostname]
> >
> > The Message-ID here is the one the recipient gets, rather than the one
> > the script generated.
> >
> > This patch uses the fact above and retrieves the Message-ID from the
> > server response. It then changes the value of the $message_id variable
> > to the one received from the server. This value will be used when next
> > and subsequent messages are sent as replies to the message, thus
> > preserving the threading of the messages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > git-send-email.perl | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/git-send-email.perl b/git-send-email.perl
> > index 9ba47a6f38..8c8544f120 100755
> > --- a/git-send-email.perl
> > +++ b/git-send-email.perl
> > @@ -1643,6 +1643,11 @@ sub gen_header {
> > return ($recipients_ref, $to, $date, $gitversion, $cc, $ccline, $header);
> > }
> >
> > +sub is_outlook {
> > + my ($host) = @_;
> > + return ($host eq 'smtp.office365.com' || $host eq 'smtp-mail.outlook.com');
> > +}
>
> No real objection here, but what about all of the company-hosted outlook
> server systems out there? Do they need this same type of "flag"? And
> if so, why not make it a config variable?
Not only Outlook comes with such quirk, AFAIK the mail service that
Tencent provides for personal usage does as well. I don't think it's a
good idea to hardcode the problematic providers.
Not sure whether similar ideas have been proposed earlier: since this
quirk affects only following e-mails but not the coverletter which
doesn't have a In-reply-to field, is it possible to detect the quirk
with the response of sending the coverletter by comparing the desired
Message-ID and the one in response? We could throw a warning and
automatically fixes following mails if the bad case really happens.
This could avoid a broken thread for newcomers and should play well with
an option introduced together for specifying dedicated behaviour.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Please Cc me on future updates of the series, thank you Aditya.
Best regards,
Yao Zi
