Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] pack-objects: use standard option incompatibility functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Now I can't un-see it ;-). Even though it's not a correctness issue as
> you note, the whole thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I'll swap the
> ordering to match the original in the next round.

I do not think we can be completely faithful to the original in this
rewrite, simply because the original is not consistent with what
die_for_incompat() thing produces and you'd need to adjust the test
anyway.  So unless there are other things you need to reroll, I
wouldn't worry about it too much.

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux