On Wed Apr 9, 2025 at 11:36 PM IST, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The other one in the example in this thread could lose the for loop > by doing > > printf "160000 commit $COMMIT\trecursive-submodule-path-%d\n" \ > $(test_seq 2000) > > but for uniformity with other parts that cannot lose "for" loop, I > would not recommend going in that direction. Interesting. I didn't know printf could be used like so. The patch I sent earlier can also be re-written to lose the loop by simply passing the output of test_seq via 'sed p' to print each number twice!
