Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 04:49:28PM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * pb/perf-test-fixes (2025-03-28) 2 commits >> - p9210: fix 'scalar clone' when running from a detached HEAD >> - p7821: fix test_perf invocation for prereqs >> >> "make perf" fixes. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> cf. <Z-pD1puYT87YKAd4@xxxxxx> >> source: <pull.1936.git.git.1743181669.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> > > I had one question around empty prereqs introduced by the patch that > wasn't yet answered. Based on my testing empty prereqs do work just fine > though and evaluate to true, so the patch series looks fine to me. > >> * ps/misc-build-fixes (2025-04-01) 5 commits >> - ci: use Visual Studio for win+meson job on GitHub Workflows >> - meson: distinguish build and target host binaries >> - meson: respect 'tests' build option in contrib >> - gitweb: fix generation of "gitweb.js" >> - meson: fix handling of '-Dcurl=auto' >> >> Random build fixes. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> cf. <CAOLa=ZQ8bTn-prAs2ycLdLLjVaLQL4GtLw_gFsvAcx_6j=MBjA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> source: <20250331-b4-pks-collect-build-fixes-v2-0-6b06136808f3@xxxxxx> > > I think this one should be ready to be merged. > >> * ab/pathspec-sign-compare-workaround (2025-04-01) 1 commit >> - pathspec: fix sign comparison warnings >> >> Some warnings from "-Wsign-compare" for pathspec.c have been >> squelched. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: <127c3010-4b23-436e-a07d-e6031e746113@xxxxxxxxx> > > I had another read just now, the patch looks good to me. > >> * jt/rev-list-z (2025-03-21) 5 commits >> - rev-list: support NUL-delimited --missing option >> - rev-list: support NUL-delimited --boundary option >> - rev-list: support delimiting objects with NUL bytes >> - rev-list: refactor early option parsing >> - rev-list: inline `show_object_with_name()` in `show_object()` >> >> "git rev-list" learns machine-parsable output format that delimits >> each field with NUL. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: <20250319183410.1225428-1-jltobler@xxxxxxxxx> > > Same here, I did scan through the series again and didn't notice > anything objectionable. > >> * sk/clar-trailer-urlmatch-norm-test (2025-03-04) 2 commits >> - t/unit-tests: convert urlmatch-normalization test to clar >> - t/unit-tests: convert trailer test to use clar >> >> A few traditional unit tests have been rewritten to use the clar >> framework. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> cf. <xmqqzfi0pthr.fsf@gitster.g> >> source: <20250304113323.10564-1-kuforiji98@xxxxxxxxx> > > Yup. I didn't review this on-list, but already reviewed it internally > before Seyi sent it to the mailing list. > > Patrick Thanks.
