On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 2:43 PM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 07:40:33PM +0530, JAYATHEERTH K wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 3:53 PM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 08:21:27PM +0530, JAYATHEERTH K wrote: > > > I already saw this in another proposal, which indicates that the project > > > idea might be a bit underspecced. In any case, the goal of the project > > > > Hey Patrick, thank you for letting me know > > I actually have been working on this proposal for a while now. > > I also sent an e-mail regarding this specific project right before > > GSOC proposals started. As far as I can see this project was not > > previously discussed therefore I picked this. > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/git/CA+rGoLdvY+JdgdzgE04EJoF9KGUpd39+2S_AgpFyucP38mdFgA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > I'm not sure how to proceed in this situation. I think I need some > > advice from your side on this. > > I think I don't quite understand what "this situation" refers to. Do you > mean that there are multiple proposals for this project now? If so, that > is perfectly fine and expected. There's only a finite number of projects > and a larger number of students, so some of the projects will have > mutliple applicants. > > In the end we will pick the student who seems to be the best match based > on both the proposal, the microproject and any other interactions with > the community. > Understood, I will carry on as is. I've sent the updated proposal above in this thread with the revised scope of the project. > Patrick - Jayatheerth
