On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 04:46:58AM -0700, Karthik Nayak wrote: > Meet Soni <meetsoni3017@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > [snip] > > > Command mapping and naming: > > --------------------------- > > > > I have taken reference for potential names for these subcommands from Patrick’s > > suggestion (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/git/-/issues/330): > > > > # Replaces git-show-ref(1) and git-for-each-ref(1). > > $ git refs list > > > > # Replaces `git show-ref --exists`. > > $ git refs exist > > > > # Replaces `git show-ref --verify <ref>`. > > $ git refs show > > > > # Replaces git-symbolic-ref(1) to show a ref. > > $ git refs resolve > > > > # Replaces git-pack-ref(1). > > $ git refs pack > > > > # Replaces git-update-ref(1). > > $ git refs write > > > > # Replaces git-check-ref-format(1). > > $ git refs check-format > > > > One other command that I noticed, which we didn't talk about it 'git > reflog'. I would think, it would be nice to also fit this as 'git refs > logs', but it doesn't have to be part of GSoC. Wouldn't that become awkward though as you now basically have subsubcommands? `git refs log expire`, `git refs log exists` and related. Patrick
