Re: [PATCH] revision: fix --left/right-only use with unrelated histories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Matt

On 30/03/2025 11:54, Matt Hunter wrote:
On Sun Mar 30, 2025 at 6:11 AM EDT, Phillip Wood wrote:
Thank you for adding a test. We have a helper function test_line_count
which provides a helpful debugging message if the comparison fails.
Using that and avoiding process substitutions we'd write

	sort head >sorted_head &&
	sort cmp >sorted_cmp &&
	comm -12 sorted_head sorted_cmp >actual &&
	test_line_count = 0 actual
Thanks for that helper tip.  I was just about to send a v2 when your
message came in, so I'm getting that incorporated now.

By the way, I had originally wanted to write test assertions that
checked the actual number of commit ids returned from each of the two
calls to rev-list - something like:

     git rev-list --X-only HEAD...cmp >file &&
     test_line_count = N file

But since I'm not very familiar with this test harness yet, I couldn't
actually figure the correct value for N.  It's not 1 (the commit made in
my test body), and it's not 2 (that commit, plus the one from the setup
case at the top of the file).  Any appropriate higher value wasn't
obvious.

Each test in a given file runs in the same repository (this is a performance optimization) so the number of commits will depend on what the previous tests have done. Usually there is a setup test at the start of the file which creates some commits with tags. Individual tests can then use those tags to establish a known state.

Best Wishes

Phillip


So I switched to what you saw in my v1.  Maybe this "no commit ids in
common" test is actually the stronger assertion?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux