On 4/1/25 12:10 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I really wish that the reviewing process offered better tools than a fixed diff for this patch; Inspecting it with `-w` would probably make it much more obvious what it does (and make it substantially easier to verify that it does not do anything inadvertently).
Agreed. The first patch is nasty due to indentation changes, git diff -w is indespensible, perhaps that should be available similar to a diffstat.
Thanks for the review. Mark
