Re: [PATCH 1/2] help: include SHA implementation in version info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

> Another option: we could ask the implementations themselves to define a
> symbol `SHA1_BACKEND` and use it here. This would automatically ensure
> that any implementation must define the symbol as we'd otherwise get a
> compile error. We could also conditionally define `SHA1_UNSAFE_BACKEND`
> depending on whether or not we have it.

Much simpler and less error prone.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux