[no subject]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 2. Function Call Integration:
> 
> Regarding migration, is it acceptable to directly invoke the legacy command
> functions by passing parameters from the new command functions?
> 

So, you want to say that could we use a subprocess to just invoke the
legacy command? I don't think we should use subprocess. If we could use
subprocess, should this project be called as a project?

I somehow think that you may first look at "git-pack-refs(1)" or
something like which is not so complicated to think about a solution.
And when writing the proposal, you may need to talk about how many
commands you want to migrate and how do you plan to migrate.

> 3. Test Retention:
> 
> Lastly, should we retain the original tests for the legacy commands, or
> should they be fully replaced with tests for the new implementations?
> 

This is a good question. From my view, we should not change the original
tests. And this would introduce another question, if we add the new test
for the new command, we'd introduce repetition. I cannot give your
answer here because I don't have experience about this.

> I appreciate your guidance and look forward to your feedback on these points.
> 
> Best regards,
> Zheng Yuting

Thanks,
Jialuo




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux