On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 08:02:16AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:34:43AM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > From ed9863971d37ed53628a5871a4a569ccd6287f53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: mirabilos <tg@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 05:33:10 +0000 > > Subject: [PATCH] Unbreak content of gitweb.js > > > > The former $^ adds all prerequisites, including the > > (proper) new dependency on the generator script. > > The commit message could use a bit of polishing. How about the > following: > > gitweb: fix generation of "gitweb.js" > > In 19d8fe7da65 (Makefile: extract script to generate gitweb.js, > 2024-12-06) we have extracted the logic to build "gitweb.js" into a > separate script. As part of that the rules that builds the script > has gained a new dependency on that script. > > This refactoring is broken though because we use "$^" to determine > the set of JavaScript files that need to be concatenated, and this > implicit variable now also contains the build script itself. As a > result, the build script ends up ni the generated "gitweb.js" file, > which is wrong. > > Fix the issue by explicitly only passing the JavaScript files. > > > Signed-off-by: mirabilos <tg@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We typically require plain names instead of aliases in the SOB. > > --- > > gitweb/Makefile | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/gitweb/Makefile b/gitweb/Makefile > > index d5748e9359..2a8f97cef8 100644 > > --- a/gitweb/Makefile > > +++ b/gitweb/Makefile > > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)gitweb.cgi: $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)gitweb.perl > > $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)static/gitweb.js: $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)generate-gitweb-js.sh > > $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)static/gitweb.js: $(addprefix $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB),$(GITWEB_JSLIB_FILES)) > > $(QUIET_GEN)$(RM) $@ $@+ && \ > > - $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)generate-gitweb-js.sh $@+ $^ && \ > > + $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)generate-gitweb-js.sh $@+ $(addprefix $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB),$(GITWEB_JSLIB_FILES)) && \ > > mv $@+ $@ > > We could avoid repetition by filtering out any files that we don't care > about, like so: > > $(filter %.js,$^) > > In any case, thanks for discovering and fixing this issue! > > Patrick Thorsten, do you plan to send another version of this patch that includes my feedback? Otherwise I'm happy to bring this over the finishing line. Thanks! Patrick
