Good catch! If I recall correctly, the very first version of the code used an asterisk instead of the "@" symbol... but it looks like I forgot to update that part of the documentation once the asterisk option was discarded. Thanks!
Good catch! If I recall correctly, the very first version of the code used an asterisk instead of the "@" symbol... but it looks like I forgot to update that part of the documentation once the asterisk option was discarded. Thanks!
|