On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 04:18:44PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote: > In a similar fashion as previous commits, use nth_midxed_pack() instead > of accessing the MIDX's ->packs array directly to support incremental > MIDXs. Probably not worth it to change it in an actual patch, but is it worth renaming midx->packs to something else to make sure we catch all of the spots that need to be considered? Or maybe you already did that, which is how you found all of these. :) -Peff
