Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Perhaps in the longer term, but I think for the reasons above that the > existing behavior (plus the new patch from v3, which we should still > queue) is sufficient. The older iteration has a few loose ends <Z8l5hxNjEOALl_g-@xxxxxx> we would want to tie. Elijah's "decision to combine should be made at half or below the max size to always make a progress" would also makes sense. Thanks.
