Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> but I also suspect that it is mostly due to the original program >>> structure that uses OPT_SUBCOMMAND() that the subcommands fail to >>> respond to "-h" unlike the top-level command, so this may not be a >>> regression. I do think however that this change is making it harder >>> to fix. >>> >> >> Hmm. But this is the existing behavior, no? > > Didn't I said I also suspect? > Yes, I misunderstood! >> But point taken, I'll drop this patch in the next version! Thanks > > Yup. Take your time, as it is already deep in prerelease feature > freeze. I'd prefer to see us leaving spare capacity in our minds to > fix regressions introduced during this period once they are noticed, > without getting distracted by shiny new toys. > > Thanks. Fair enough. I only pushed this new topic, because I had mentioned to you that I would pick it up and I didn't want to forget about it. Either ways, I will take it slow here! :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
