On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 05:30:03PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote: > On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 10:01:23PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh b/t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh > > index d3df81e785..cea8f92a3d 100755 > > --- a/t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh > > +++ b/t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh > > @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ test_expect_success 'even with handcrafted request, filter does not work if not > > test-tool -C server serve-v2 --stateless-rpc <in >/dev/null > > ' > > > > -test_expect_success 'default refspec is used to filter ref when fetchcing' ' > > +test_expect_success 'default refspec is used to filter ref when fetching' ' > > Maybe I am not seeing enough of the context below to know for sure, but > > s/ref/&s > > ? Possibly. I think you could read it as "it should filter refs" (which it obviously should). But you could also read it as "it should filter some singular ref that we do not expect to find in the result". Of course the test itself seems to just snoop on the protocol conversation, which I guess is more like the first reading. I didn't really want to get into word-smithing the test titles. I just couldn't handle seeing that typo over and over while working on adjacent tests. -Peff
