Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Once you stop treating [GSoC] as if it is an independent prefix, >> everything will fall into place naturally without adding anything >> extra. > > So, instead of changing the behavior of format-patch, would it be > better if we changed the documentation to ask these patches to be > sent with `[GSoC PATCH]` or similar instead of `[GSoC][PATCH]`? Yup, I do not know offhand who are managing these descriptions, but having extra moniker in the same [square bracket] as PATCH is a more common practice, and we should follow suit. Thanks.
