On 2025-02-11 at 13:24 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On 2025-02-11 at 10:37 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > This series extends the concept of "excluded files" in `git clean` to > > > > make it useful to protect "precious files" that might be present in a > > > > specific developer's working tree (see below). > > > > > > How does it interact with "git status"? > > > > In the same way as `git clean -e`, i.e., there is no interaction. > > That is dissapointing. I was hoping that "git status -u" would list > precious and ignored ones in two separate sections. Do I need to implement those interactions in order for this patch set to be considered viable? > > > There were no implications behind my usage of the word "precious". > > Then you should ;-) We'd like to see us use the same language to > refer to the same concept within this same project (and more > importantly, avoid misleading people by calling two different things > with the same phrase). I did not intend to mislead anyone (as evident by the fact that I was simply not aware of any preexisting connotations). I'd appreciate suggestions for a replacement term. -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx / > > > This email was part of the `perl contrib/contacts/git-contacts` output > > for this patchset, as documented in Documentation/SubmittingPatches > > and Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt. Should I have not done that? > > No, as I said, I was curious if he is getting involved with the > project back again behind the curtain.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
