> Unfortunately, Clang and GCC implement different rules here, so perhaps > it would be best to avoid a dependency on that, if possible?.. I'm actually trying to fix Clang to make it compatible with GCC (at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/132604 ) :~) > For GCC, element type for the resulting vector is chosen in > c_common_type_for_size, which starts by picking a suitable type in sequence > int, signed char, short, long, long long. Hence, 'long' is never chosen on > ILP32 platforms, and 'long long' won't be picked on LP64. Thank you for your description of the behavior! PS: Sorry, I forgot to include the mailing list in the first reply.
