Re: status of libjit vs GNU lightning vs libgccjit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I used libjit around 2018-2019 and even then it didn’t seem like a very
active project, however it wasn’t an issue because it pretty much just
worked. It’s not like the processor instructions keep changing after all.
Also it’s simple enough that you can add your own features if you need them.

I tried LLVM for the same project, but it was much more complicated. Maybe
they’ve made it easier to use in the meantime?

W


On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 9:25 AM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, 2025-05-04 at 21:05 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > Hello all from France,
> >
> > I have the feeling that libjit is no more active or updated, since
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libjit/ has few messages and the last
> > gitcommit to libjit seems to be 942c988db170d98061a9e934fb3 from Aleksey
> Demakov
> >
> > GNU lightning has similar goals (quick machine code generation) and a
> different
> > ABI. From France right now (Sun May  4 07:00:48 PM UTC 2025) I am unable
> to
> > access 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/lightning.git/': The requested
> URL
> > returned error: 502
>
> I don't know much about libgccjit, nor libjit nor lightning, but
> recently it seems savannah has some issue and it often returns HTTP 502.
>
>
> --
> Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux