GCC Help
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Can I force gcc not to optimize calling to leaf functions with `-O2' option?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Trying to use a static lib compiled with gcc in a VS application
- From: "Tammy Lavi" <tammy.lavi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with exceptions on arm
- From: "Martin Guy" <martinwguy@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Openmp sections
- From: Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek@xxxxxx>
- Openmp sections
- From: Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek@xxxxxx>
- Re: Can I force gcc not to optimize calling to leaf functions with `-O2' option?
- From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Signedness of char and puts()
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Can I force gcc not to optimize calling to leaf functions with `-O2' option?
- From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: V_MUST_DEF vs V_MAY_DEF ?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- V_MUST_DEF vs V_MAY_DEF ?
- From: QiangHuang <qianghuang87@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: compile with no prefix
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: Lorenzo Pesce <lpesce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Signedness of char and puts()
- From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Signedness of char and puts()
- From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Signedness of char and puts()
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: Lorenzo Pesce <lpesce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Floating Point Support
- From: PatrickClarityMicro <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Signedness of char and puts()
- From: "Ed Stafford" <ed.stafford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: Lorenzo Pesce <lpesce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: Lorenzo Pesce <lpesce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: Lorenzo Pesce <lpesce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- compile with no prefix
- From: "George Neill" <georgen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: newbie trying to install and build
- From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ Macros, ##, and ::
- From: Daniel Lohmann <daniel.lohmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ambiguous std::fill with character array
- From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ambiguous std::fill with character array
- From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ambiguous std::fill with character array
- From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ambiguous std::fill with character array
- From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
- newbie trying to install and build
- From: chris kuhlman <ckuhlman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- ambiguous std::fill with character array
- From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- C++ Macros, ##, and ::
- From: Harvey Chapman <hchapman-gcc-help@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Does GCC really recognize __attribute__ ((bitwise))?
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: newbie question on linking classes
- From: "Koyel Mukherjee" <koyelmjee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Does GCC really recognize __attribute__ ((bitwise))?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: static stack check
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: newbie question on linking classes
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- newbie question on linking classes
- From: "Koyel Mukherjee" <koyelmjee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Build Failure for gcc 4.3.0
- From: "Satoshi OHSHIMA" <satoshiohshima@xxxxxxxxx>
- Does GCC really recognize __attribute__ ((bitwise))?
- From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- static stack check
- From: "Maurizio Papini" <maurizio.papini@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problem with exceptions on arm
- From: Henrik Grindal Bakken <hgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to initialize union?
- From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [help] undefined reference to `_Unwind_SjLj_Register'
- From: "Deepak Barua" <dbbarua@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [help] undefined reference to `_Unwind_SjLj_Register'
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [help] undefined reference to `_Unwind_SjLj_Register'
- From: "Deepak Barua" <dbbarua@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue on X86_64?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Exception handling on AIX5.3 with gcc 3.4.6
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Quieten -Wconversion warnings for bit-fields
- From: Christian Iseli <Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Issue on X86_64?
- From: Lorenzo Pesce <lpesce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GSoC - GCC Multithreaded linker
- From: Philipp Thomas <pth@xxxxxxx>
- cross compiling on different hosts
- From: "Naveen Dankal" <naveend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about __attribute((cold))
- From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [help] undefined reference to `_Unwind_SjLj_Register'
- From: "Deepak Barua" <dbbarua@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about __attribute((cold))
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about __attribute((cold))
- From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How does GCC4 transform GIMPLE IR to SSA?
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with static library linking
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problem with static library linking
- From: Harish <harish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [help] undefined reference to `_Unwind_SjLj_Register'
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [help] undefined reference to `_Unwind_SjLj_Register'
- From: "Deepak Barua" <dbbarua@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to initialize union?
- From: "Deepen Mantri" <Deepen.Mantri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- GSoC - GCC Multithreaded linker
- From: "Daniel P. Volpato" <danielpv@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc for windows
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Quieten -Wconversion warnings for bit-fields
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <manuellopezibanez@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc for windows
- From: Rodolfo Lima <rodolfo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- gcc for windows
- From: "Freeman Gilmore" <freeman.gilmore@xxxxxxxxx>
- How does GCC4 transform GIMPLE IR to SSA?
- From: QiangHuang <qianghuang87@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Exception handling on AIX5.3 with gcc 3.4.6
- From: "Shlom Marom" <devshlom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: On the C99 Status
- From: Martin Krischik <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help!!! build failed for GCC-3.2.3
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Questions about __attribute((cold))
- From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: On the C99 Status
- From: "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: On the C99 Status
- From: Martin Krischik <krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help!!! build failed for GCC-3.2.3
- From: se7en_hills <elumalai_selvan@xxxxxxxxx>
- how to initialize union?
- From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
- On the C99 Status
- From: "Paulo J. Matos" <pocm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Exception handling on AIX5.3 with gcc 3.4.6
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Problem with GCC 4.2 and above
- From: Lorenzo Pesce <lpesce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help!!! build failed for GCC-3.2.3
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Exception handling on AIX5.3 with gcc 3.4.6
- From: "Shlom Marom" <devshlom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: "Noel Yap" <noel.yap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Help!!! build failed for GCC-3.2.3
- From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
- Help!!! build failed for GCC-3.2.3
- From: se7en_hills <elumalai_selvan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: "Noel Yap" <noel.yap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Passing array variable as Input Constraint to lea Inline Assembly instruction; works on i386, not on AMD64
- From: Daniel Yek <dyek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Exception handling on AIX5.3 with gcc 3.4.6
- From: David Edelsohn <dje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Exception handling on AIX5.3 with gcc 3.4.6
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Exception handling on AIX5.3 with gcc 3.4.6
- From: "Shlom Marom" <devshlom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Dynamic compilation using gcc
- From: Klaus Grue <grue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: Ted Byers <r.ted.byers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- INT64
- From: Fabian Wein <fabian.wein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Dynamic compilation using gcc
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: "Noel Yap" <noel.yap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What does the version number of gcc mean ?
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Passing array variable address as Input Constraint to Inline Assembly block
- From: Daniel Yek <dyek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: What does the version number of gcc mean ?
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Dynamic compilation using gcc
- From: Klaus Grue <grue@xxxxxxx>
- What does the version number of gcc mean ?
- From: "d hongqian" <dhongqian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 64-bit write() system call
- From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 64-bit write() system call
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- 64-bit write() system call
- From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MyFirstTestsuite!
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: Ted Byers <r.ted.byers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: Ted Byers <r.ted.byers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: try, finally
- From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
- try, finally
- From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stack variables and loops
- From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stack variables and loops
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- stack variables and loops
- From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: AIX 5.3 gcc 4.1.2 bootstrap error
- From: "Jonathan Saxton" <jsaxton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AIX 5.3 gcc 4.1.2 bootstrap error
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: AIX 5.3 gcc 4.1.2 bootstrap error
- From: "Jonathan Saxton" <jsaxton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How can I get the dump file which is in SSA form ?
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- How can I get the dump file which is in SSA form ?
- From: "Qiang Huang" <qianghuang87@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Modifying the std C libraries
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- SOLVED! Re: mudflapth - undefined symbol: main
- From: John Carter <john.carter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Modifying the std C libraries
- From: Rick Mann <rmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: mudflapth - undefined symbol: main
- From: John Carter <john.carter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Strange syntax error problem with mmorpg-framework
- From: Alexander Christian <alex@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Strange syntax error problem with mmorpg-framework
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Strange syntax error problem with mmorpg-framework
- From: Donald Duck <alex@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc-4.3.0 files to find mpfr.h on osx 10.5.2
- From: kaaposc <kaaposc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Strange syntax error problem with mmorpg-framework
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: An error occured when building gcc4.3.0
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- gcc-4.2.2 build on solaris-10 failing
- From: Malay HALDER <malay.halder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Strange syntax error problem with mmorpg-framework
- From: Donald Duck <alex@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: mudflapth - undefined symbol: main
- From: starlight@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: MyFirstTestsuite!
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- tutorial needed
- From: "Kapil Kumar" <kaps2121@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MyFirstTestsuite!
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- MyFirstTestsuite!
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is -O2 breaking sse2 alignment?
- From: Maximillian Murphy <m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is -O2 breaking sse2 alignment?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc-4.3.0 fails to find mpfr.h on (centos and osx)
- From: Bill Broadley <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- C++0x rvalue refs get clobbered somehow
- From: Lukas Mai <l.mai@xxxxxx>
- gcc-4.3.0 fails to find mpfr.h on centos-4.5 (using gcc3 and gcc4)
- From: Bill Broadley <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help regarding input.
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.3.0 strange problem with computation and optimization
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: precision of complex numbers
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is -O2 breaking sse2 alignment?
- From: Maximillian Murphy <m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is -O2 breaking sse2 alignment?
- From: "Brian Budge" <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc-4.3.0 files to find mpfr.h on osx 10.5.2
- From: Bill Broadley <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: fortran - changing precision of real numbers
- From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 4.2.0 tool chain build on Solaris 2.7
- From: "John Morrison" <JMorrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.3.0 strange problem with computation and optimization
- From: Lasse Kliemann <lasse-list-gcc-2008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: 4.3.0 strange problem with computation and optimization
- From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: workaround for "error: more than 30 operands in 'asm'"?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.3.0 strange problem with computation and optimization
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: workaround for "error: more than 30 operands in 'asm'"?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: workaround for "error: more than 30 operands in 'asm'"?
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: workaround for "error: more than 30 operands in 'asm'"?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- creating c shared library on AIX and HP
- From: gkarthi29 <karthikeyan.gangatharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.2.3 : make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
- From: "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: workaround for "error: more than 30 operands in 'asm'"?
- From: "Clem Taylor" <clem.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is -O2 breaking sse2 alignment?
- From: JP Fournier <jape41@xxxxxxxxx>
- Nobody "hereby disclaims" in GCC's GPL except Yoyodyne, Inc.
- From: "J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza@xxxxxxxxx>
- mudflapth - undefined symbol: main
- From: John Carter <john.carter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: workaround for "error: more than 30 operands in 'asm'"?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bug: 21.5-b28] performance on aix, cpu hog
- From: "Jerry James" <james@xxxxxxxxxx>
- precision of complex numbers
- From: "Dima Sorkin" <dima.sorkin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.3.0 strange problem with computation and optimization
- From: "Dario Saccavino" <kathoum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.3.0 strange problem with computation and optimization
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.3.0 strange problem with computation and optimization
- From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: workaround for "error: more than 30 operands in 'asm'"?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: workaround for "error: more than 30 operands in 'asm'"?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Library libbackend.a
- From: James Allsopp <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Library libbackend.a
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is -O2 breaking sse2 alignment?
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Library libbackend.a
- From: James Allsopp <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- is -O2 breaking sse2 alignment?
- From: JP Fournier <jape41@xxxxxxxxx>
- workaround for "error: more than 30 operands in 'asm'"?
- From: "Clem Taylor" <clem.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fortran - changing precision of real numbers
- From: burlen <burlen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- fortran - changing precision of real numbers
- From: "Dima Sorkin" <dima.sorkin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.3.0 strange problem with computation and optimization
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.3.0 strange problem with computation and optimization
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 4.3.0 strange problem with computation and optimization
- From: Lasse Kliemann <lasse-list-gcc-2008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help regarding input.
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Help regarding input.
- From: "Tushar kant" <tusharkant15@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc-4.2.2 build on solaris-10 failing
- From: "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bug: 21.5-b28] performance on aix, cpu hog
- From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.2.3 : make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
- From: "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc-4.2.2 build on solaris-10 failing
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- gcc-4.2.2 build on solaris-10 failing
- From: Malay HALDER <malay.halder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.2.3 : make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
- From: "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to change the default attributes of sections declared with __attribute__(( section("my-section") ))?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.2.3 : make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- How to change the default attributes of sections declared with __attribute__(( section("my-section") ))?
- From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc 4.2.3 : make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
- From: "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Any GCC 4.3.0 builds under AIX 6.1 yet?
- From: "Rob Sherry" <rsherry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: int() always zero?
- From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
- int() always zero?
- From: Jason Mancini <jayrusman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: alignment of array
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- alignment of array
- From: "massimiliano cialdi" <cialdi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: frexp function misoptimization
- From: Jeremy Sanders <jss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Full path in compiler warning/error messages
- From: Geert Vancompernolle <geert.vancompernolle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Graph coloring
- From: aparna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Seg fault in call_gmon_start
- From: Jim Wilson <wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disabling GGC
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Disabling GGC
- From: Paul <ymousnw2@xxxxxxx>
- Re: frexp function misoptimization
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: insn
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem with -funit-at-a-time
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: insn
- From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: insn
- From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: insn
- From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: insn
- From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: insn
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- problem in using loop interchange transformation
- From: "Jaishri" <jaishri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- libgcc_p
- From: "Gian Lorenzo Meocci" <glmeocci@xxxxxxxxx>
- frexp function misoptimization
- From: Jeremy Sanders <jss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Use an undefined variable
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Use an undefined variable
- From: "Dario Saccavino" <kathoum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Use an undefined variable
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem with AVR cross compiler
- From: Egbert Jan van den Bussche <egbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem with AVR cross compiler
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem with AVR cross compiler
- From: Egbert Jan van den Bussche <egbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem with AVR cross compiler
- From: Egbert Jan van den Bussche <egbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem with AVR cross compiler
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- insn
- From: aparna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: problem with AVR cross compiler
- From: Egbert Jan van den Bussche <egbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Seg fault in call_gmon_start
- From: "Desineni, Harikishan" <hdesinen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmx.h
- From: Maximillian Murphy <m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmx.h
- From: Maximillian Murphy <m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Nested std::tr1::bind problem.
- From: Rodolfo Lima <rodolfo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmx.h
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmx.h
- From: Maximillian Murphy <m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcov vs. multiple objects derived from the same source
- From: Holger Blasum <hbl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: assignment operators for union member classes
- From: "Lawrence Crowl" <crowl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem with AVR cross compiler
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- problem with AVR cross compiler
- From: Egbert Jan van den Bussche <egbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- compiling 4.1.2 with CLASSPATH: Error libgcj.spec not existing
- From: Szymon Bereziak <bereziak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Use an undefined variable
- From: pierozanetti <piero.corima@xxxxxxxxx>
- problem with -funit-at-a-time
- From: "Aparna Jain (apjain)" <apjain@xxxxxxxxx>
- Issues with name mangling
- From: Lorenzo Pesce <lpesce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with GCC on Cygwin
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: binary compiled with -O1 and w/ individual optimization flags are not the same
- From: CSights <csights@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how gcc thinks `char' as signed char or unsigned char ?
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- in-charge constructors and destructors of abstract classes
- From: Roman Zybin <phoenix@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how gcc thinks `char' as signed char or unsigned char ?
- From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Help with GCC on Cygwin
- From: "Balaji V. Iyer" <bviyer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: how gcc thinks `char' as signed char or unsigned char ?
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how gcc thinks `char' as signed char or unsigned char ?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- how gcc thinks `char' as signed char or unsigned char ?
- From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcov vs. multiple objects derived from the same source
- From: "Bernd Jendrissek" <bernd.jendrissek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Interleaved access in GCC vectorization
- From: Ira Rosen <IRAR@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Porting to .intel_syntax Inline Assembly / "m" Constraint with .intel_syntax / Targeting -fPIC
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- What's the meaing of "Incorrect sharing of tree nodes"?
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Full path in compiler warning/error messages
- From: Geert Vancompernolle <geert.vancompernolle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error building GCC trunk on CELL SPU
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx>
- Re: Interleaved access in GCC vectorization
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Interleaved access in GCC vectorization
- From: "Jaishri" <jaishri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ld: Can't find library or mismatched ABI for -lc
- From: marc.mueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: libstdc++.so depends on libstdc++.so
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Error building GCC trunk on CELL SPU
- From: Revital1 Eres <ERES@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Porting to .intel_syntax Inline Assembly / "m" Constraint with .intel_syntax / Targeting -fPIC
- From: Daniel Yek <dyek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: restricted pointers
- From: "Carlos Alvarez" <carl.alv@xxxxxxxxx>
- libstdc++.so depends on libstdc++.so
- Re: warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
- From: Andre Kirchner <supercroc1974@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: internal compiler error
- From: "raian.ufop" <raian.ufop@xxxxxxxxx>
- Quieten -Wconversion warnings for bit-fields
- From: Christian Iseli <Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: AIX/g++: Preventing early destruction of exception handling
- From: Michael Veksler <VEKSLER@xxxxxxxxxx>
- AIX/g++: Preventing early destruction of exception handling
- From: Michael Veksler <VEKSLER@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: restricted pointers
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inline functions in C99
- From: "Paulo J. Matos" <pocm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- interference gragh
- From: aparna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Inline functions in C99
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- bitmap_set_bit
- From: aparna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Inline functions in C99
- From: "Paulo J. Matos" <pocm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Moving from 4.1.2 to 4.2.3 generates problems with size_t def.
- From: "Paulo J. Matos" <pocm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Moving from 4.1.2 to 4.2.3 generates problems with size_t def.
- From: "Paulo J. Matos" <pocm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Inline functions in C99
- From: "Paulo J. Matos" <pocm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- who calls tree_linear_transform() ?
- From: "Jaishri" <jaishri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: binary compiled with -O1 and w/ individual optimization flags are not the same
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: binary compiled with -O1 and w/ individual optimization flags are not the same
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: binary compiled with -O1 and w/ individual optimization flags are not the same
- From: CSights <csights@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- restricted pointers
- From: "Carlos Alvarez" <carl.alv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Structure alignment with gcc
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Structure alignment with gcc
- From: youhaodeyi <youhaodeyi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: binary compiled with -O1 and w/ individual optimization flags are not the same
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- problems with gfortran
- From: Giorgio Lulli <lulli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: binary compiled with -O1 and w/ individual optimization flags are not the same
- From: CSights <csights@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem going to GCC from ICC
- From: tmortime <akira666_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: internal compiler error
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- internal compiler error
- From: "raian.ufop" <raian.ufop@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to create a "finish" function for a tree opt pass
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to create a "finish" function for a tree opt pass
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: binary compiled with -O1 and w/ individual optimization flags are not the same
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: binary compiled with -O1 and w/ individual optimization flags are not the same
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: binary compiled with -O1 and w/ individual optimization flags are not the same
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- binary compiled with -O1 and w/ individual optimization flags are not the same
- From: CSights <csights@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to build interference graph in gcc
- From: aparna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- RE: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: "Rodrigo Dominguez" <roddomi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: "Rodrigo Dominguez" <roddomi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimizations and the -pedantic option
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: const issues
- From: "Jason Pepas" <jasonpepas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to build interference graph in gcc
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Static stack usage analysis for c/c++
- From: "massimiliano cialdi" <cialdi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcj (gcc-4.3.0-RC-20080222): compiling for ARM-v4t-linux-gnueabi: error on compile
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimizations and the -pedantic option
- From: "Dario Saccavino" <kathoum@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: "Rodrigo Dominguez" <roddomi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to create a "finish" function for a tree opt pass
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- gcj (gcc-4.3.0-RC-20080222): compiling for ARM-v4t-linux-gnueabi: error on compile
- From: Szymon Bereziak <bereziak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: "Martin Guy" <martinwguy@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to build interference graph in gcc
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem going to GCC from ICC
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimizations and the -pedantic option
- From: "Dario Saccavino" <kathoum@xxxxxxxxx>
- how to build interference graph in gcc
- From: aparna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: const issues
- From: "Dario Saccavino" <kathoum@xxxxxxxxx>
- const issues
- From: "Jason Pepas" <jasonpepas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Linking to a static library compiled with a different version of gcc
- From: Jean-Luc Aufranc <jaufranc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to create a "finish" function for a tree opt pass
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ra-build.c
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- invalid pointer
- From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Problem going to GCC from ICC
- From: tmortime <akira666_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- ra-build.c
- From: aparna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Thumb->ARM->Thumb in inline-wrapped asm? [31740]
- From: dave madden <dhm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: "Rodrigo Dominguez" <roddomi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: "Rodrigo Dominguez" <roddomi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to rebuild GCC?
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: "Martin Guy" <martinwguy@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- How to rebuild GCC?
- From: "Jaishri" <jaishri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to use testsuite to check vectorization capabilities
- From: Tehila Meyzels <TEHILA@xxxxxxxxxx>
- how to use testsuite to check vectorization capabilities
- From: "Jaishri" <jaishri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Another question. How can I dump gimple IR after optimization pass?
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC 3.3 binary for XScale
- From: "Rodrigo Dominguez" <roddomi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Another question. How can I dump gimple IR after optimization pass?
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Another question. How can I dump gimple IR after optimization pass?
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Thumb->ARM->Thumb in inline-wrapped asm?
- From: dave madden <dhm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Aligning function on a page boundary
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Aligning function on a page boundary
- From: "Igor Bukanov" <igor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Aligning function on a page boundary
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Aligning function on a page boundary
- From: "Igor Bukanov" <igor@xxxxxxxx>
- denormalized number problem under AIX
- From: "Eric Fernandez" <efernandez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: running library built in gcc 3.4 on another linux box with gcc 2.96
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Question about DECL_UID of struct field
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: running library built in gcc 3.4 on another linux box with gcc 2.96
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimizations and the -pedantic option
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Optimizations and the -pedantic option
- From: "Dario Saccavino" <kathoum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Need Help With Optimization Options
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc-3.4.3 and libstdc++.so.(5|6)
- From: Jens Müller <jens.mueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: strict aliasing rule and examples
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Need Help With Optimization Options
- From: "Valery Klimov" <mole.83@xxxxxxxxx>
- Need help with optimization options
- From: "Valery Klimov" <mole.83@xxxxxxxxx>
- strict aliasing rule and examples
- From: Mojmir Svoboda <mojmir.svoboda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: running library built in gcc 3.4 on another linux box with gcc 2.96
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Another question. How can I dump gimple IR after optimization pass?
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ 4.2.x x86: code generation for __sync_lock_test_and_set() - builtin
- From: Daniel Lohmann <daniel.lohmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- running library built in gcc 3.4 on another linux box with gcc 2.96
- From: "Yi Pan" <yi.ypan@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to instrument an initcall?
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- [SOLVED] Linking problems with gcc 4.2.2 and AIX 5.2
- From: "Jonathan Saxton" <jsaxton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ 4.2.x x86: code generation for __sync_lock_test_and_set() - builtin
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc-3.4.3 and libstdc++.so.(5|6)
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: Philipp Thomas <pth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: may be undefined operation warning
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: may be undefined operation warning
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: may be undefined operation warning
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- const array warning question
- From: Andres Meyer <andres.meyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- g++ 4.2.x x86: code generation for __sync_lock_test_and_set() - builtin
- From: Daniel Lohmann <daniel.lohmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: non virtual dtor warning
- From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: data base calls
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to traverse through all type declarations in a compilation module?
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- data base calls
- From: "peterjup@xxxxxxxxxx" <peterjup@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: may be undefined operation warning
- From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: may be undefined operation warning
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: may be undefined operation warning
- From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: may be undefined operation warning
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: may be undefined operation warning
- From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: may be undefined operation warning
- From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: may be undefined operation warning
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- may be undefined operation warning
- From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
- non virtual dtor warning
- From: "James Tebneff" <tebneff@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc-3.4.3 and libstdc++.so.(5|6)
- From: Jens Müller <blog@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Same code but different objects layout = different output object size
- From: Felipe Astroza <felipe.astroza@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: inlined functions and ABI guarantees
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: inlined functions and ABI guarantees
- From: Maurizio Vitale <maurizio.vitale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: inlined functions and ABI guarantees
- From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: inlined functions and ABI guarantees
- From: Maurizio Vitale <maurizio.vitale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Migrating from gcc 2.95.3 to 3.4.5 in vxWorks on Power Pc platforms
- From: "Aparna Upadhya" <aparna.upadhya@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: How to force gcc to long-call a function (on MIPS)?
- From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 3.2
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 3.2
- From: Mihai Donțu <mihai.dontu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: gcc 3.2
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <manuellopezibanez@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: How to force gcc to long-call a function (on MIPS)?
- From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Target specific behaviour
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Target specific behaviour
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Target specific behaviour
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C main 32/64 bit prologues differ
- From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Target specific behaviour
- From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: inlined functions and ABI guarantees
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C main 32/64 bit prologues differ
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Target specific behaviour
- From: "Kevin André" <kevin.andre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Cannot compile GCC on Ubuntu 7.10 x86_64
- From: Serge Belyshev <belyshev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Function Lookup
- From: ANOOP <anoop.chargotra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Function Lookup
- From: Sven Eschenberg <eschenb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Function Lookup
- From: "corey taylor" <corey.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Function Lookup
- From: ANOOP <anoop.chargotra@xxxxxxxxx>
- inlined functions and ABI guarantees
- From: Maurizio Vitale <maurizio.vitale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Cannot compile GCC on Ubuntu 7.10 x86_64
- From: Igor Chudov <ichudov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Force generation of an uncalled method?
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Force generation of an uncalled method?
- From: stepleton@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Force generation of an uncalled method?
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- C main 32/64 bit prologues differ
- From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
- Force generation of an uncalled method?
- From: stepleton@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: How to force gcc to long-call a function (on MIPS)?
- From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Same code but different objects layout = different output object size
- From: Felipe Astroza <felipe.astroza@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Add a new option in gcc
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 3.2
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc 3.2
- From: shakeeb ahmed <shakeeb_ahmed99@xxxxxxxxx>
- Add a new option in gcc
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: "David Arthur" <darthur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: "David Arthur" <darthur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: "David Arthur" <darthur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ and templates
- From: Mihai Donțu <mihai.dontu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ and templates
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- g++ and templates
- From: Mihai Donțu <mihai.dontu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: How to force gcc to long-call a function (on MIPS)?
- From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to force gcc to long-call a function (on MIPS)?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: How to force gcc to long-call a function (on MIPS)?
- From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to force gcc to long-call a function (on MIPS)?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Convention about jump ?
- From: Antoine Eiche <antoine.eiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What's the C protype for the variables defined in a linker script
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- What's the C protype for the variables defined in a linker script
- From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to force gcc to long-call a function (on MIPS)?
- From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why does gcc's Makefile have so many targets?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to build a stripped version of gcc
- From: Marcelo Slomp <mslomp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Same code but different objects layout = different output object size
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C Execution Problem
- From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Same code but different objects layout = different output object size
- From: Felipe Astroza <felipe.astroza@xxxxxxxxx>
- C Execution Problem
- From: Ponchi <mournnn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: openmp + pthreads
- From: "Frédéric Bastien" <nouiz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Convention about jump ?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Convention about jump ?
- From: Antoine Eiche <antoine.eiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- openmp + pthreads
- From: "Haris Saybasili" <haris.saybasili@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to instrument a program using GCC
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to forbid a function to use stack?
- From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AIX 5.3 gcc 4.1.2 bootstrap error
- From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: assignment operators for union member classes
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- assignment operators for union member classes
- From: Mike Welsen <mikewelsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Correct ordering of write operations
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to instrument a program using GCC
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to forbid a function to use stack?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- How to forbid a function to use stack?
- From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: x = ++x + ++x
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <manuellopezibanez@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to instrument a program using GCC
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem about mips .data section
- From: "robert song" <robertsong.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Correct ordering of write operations
- From: Ryan Lortie <desrt@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target?
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target?
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Compiling error gcc/g77 - MinGW
- From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC: Compilation using C/C++
- From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiling error gcc/g77 - MinGW
- From: Jan Robbe <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Compiling error gcc/g77 - MinGW
- From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiling error gcc/g77 - MinGW
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Compiling error gcc/g77 - MinGW
- From: Jan Robbe <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc hangs ! (version 4.1.2, Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)
- From: "Sunzir Deepur" <sunzird@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc hangs ! (version 4.1.2, Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc hangs ! (version 4.1.2, Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)
- From: "Sunzir Deepur" <sunzird@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc hangs ! (version 4.1.2, Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc hangs ! (version 4.1.2, Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)
- From: "Sunzir Deepur" <sunzird@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc hangs ! (version 4.1.2, Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC: Compilation using C/C++
- From: Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese@xxxxxxxx>
- GCC: Compilation using C/C++
- From: Ricardo Sardano Guanciale <ricardo.guanciale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Building cross compiler for x86_64
- From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target?
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target?
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to instrument a program using GCC
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: trouble converting libgsl.a -> libgsl.so on cygwin
- From: "Mirko Vukovic" <mirko.vukovic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target?
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: trouble converting libgsl.a -> libgsl.so on cygwin
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- trouble converting libgsl.a -> libgsl.so on cygwin
- From: "Mirko Vukovic" <mirko.vukovic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Why does gcc's Makefile have so many targets?
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target?
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64
- From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Building cross compiler for x86_64
- From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to instrument a program using GCC
- From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Building cross compiler for x86_64
- From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
- From: Andrew W <ajwood@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: x = ++x + ++x
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- x = ++x + ++x
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building a cross compiler for x86_64
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Building a cross compiler for x86_64
- From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building a cross compiler for x86_64
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Building a cross compiler for x86_64
- From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc install problem
- From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building a cross compiler for x86_64
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: static linking warning
- From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can GCC use more than 4G while compiling ?
- From: Tomas Kalibera <kalibera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: "David Arthur" <darthur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Building a cross compiler for x86_64
- From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Problems with __attribute__
- From: Angus <angus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- static linking warning
- From: burlen <burlen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc install problem
- From: Jim Marshall <jim.marshall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: "Tynan Wilke" <tynan.wilke@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: Tony Wetmore <tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: "Tynan Wilke" <tynan.wilke@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: Tony Wetmore <tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
- From: "Tynan Wilke" <tynan.wilke@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc install problem
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to build a stripped version of gcc
- From: Philippe Scelers <philippe_scelers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AIX 5.3 gcc 4.1.2 bootstrap error
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx>
- AIX 5.3 gcc 4.1.2 bootstrap error
- From: Ben Scurr <bs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- gcc install problem
- From: sgtbob <rrunion@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Can GCC use more than 4G while compiling ?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can GCC use more than 4G while compiling ?
- From: Tomas Kalibera <kalibera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can GCC use more than 4G while compiling ?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
- From: "James Tebneff" <tebneff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Can GCC use more than 4G while compiling ?
- From: Tomas Kalibera <kalibera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dead code identification
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Gloom and despair. Can't link any STL objects (gcc 4.2.2 on AIX 5.2)
- From: "Jonathan Saxton" <jsaxton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
- From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Subject: Re: Problem Executing Application Beginning at gcc Version 4.1.3
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dead code identification
- From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Problem Executing Application Beginning at gcc Version 4.1.3
- From: Marshall Lake <mlake@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dead code identification
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dead code identification
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dead code identification
- From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dead code identification
- From: Mark Hampton <mark.hampton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dead code identification
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dead code identification
- From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
- From: "Rene Perlberg" <Perle5000@xxxxxx>
- Re: Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
- From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
- From: "Rene Perlberg" <Perle5000@xxxxxx>
- Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is this a valid approach to aliasing?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dead code identification
- From: Mark Hampton <mark.hampton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Another template/static member question
- From: Harvey Chapman <hchapman-gcc-help@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Another template/static member question
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Summer of Code status
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Another template/static member question
- From: Harvey Chapman <hchapman-gcc-help@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Summer of Code status
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
- From: "Ian S. Worthington" <ianworthington@xxxxxxx>
- Re: is this a valid approach to aliasing?
- From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: "James Tebneff" <tebneff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Summer of Code status
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: "David Arthur" <darthur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
- From: "Poor Yorick" <org.gnu.gcc.help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
- From: "David Arthur" <darthur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
- From: "Ian S. Worthington" <ianworthington@xxxxxxx>
- Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
- From: "Ian S. Worthington" <ianworthington@xxxxxxx>
- Re: dead code identification
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Floating Point Support
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
- From: "Ian S. Worthington" <ianworthington@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Disassemble binary with Debug info
- From: Wombat <wombat23@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Summer of Code status
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
- From: Andrew W <ajwood@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Disassemble binary with Debug info
- From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disassemble binary with Debug info
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Disassemble binary with Debug info
- From: Wombat <wombat23@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is this a valid approach to aliasing?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is this a valid approach to aliasing?
- From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is this a valid approach to aliasing?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- is this a valid approach to aliasing?
- From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
- dead code identification
- From: Mark Hampton <mark.hampton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
- From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
- From: Andrew W <ajwood@xxxxxxx>
- Floating Point Support
- From: PatrickClarityMicro <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
- From: "Godmar Back" <godmar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
- From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
- From: "Godmar Back" <godmar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
- From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Installing gcc-4.2.3 in Fedora core 8, separately from gcc-4.1
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc for sh-linux: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- From: "Deepak Barua" <dbbarua@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Installing gcc-4.2.3 in Fedora core 8, separately from gcc-4.1
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Installing gcc-4.2.3 in Fedora core 8, separately from gcc-4.1
- From: "Ken McFarlane" <kwmcfarlane@xxxxxxxxx>
- Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
- From: Andrew W <ajwood@xxxxxxx>
- How to build 64-bits Ada library on SPARC Solaris 2.9 ?
- From: Paul Duquennoy <paul.duquennoy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 64-bit for OS kernel development
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
- From: "Godmar Back" <godmar@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 64-bit for OS kernel development
- From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
- From: "Godmar Back" <godmar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem Executing Application Beginning at gcc Version 4.1.3
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 64-bit for OS kernel development
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- optimization of switch statements on i386
- From: "Godmar Back" <godmar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unknown directives
- From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unknown directives
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem about mips .data section
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- alignment problems with gglobal variables ,GCC for arc
- From: Mike Welsen <mikewelsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Building gcc-4.2.3
- From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimiziation questions (c++)
- From: Tony Wetmore <tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- __sync_compare_and_swap_16 argument alignment
- From: Tim Blechmann <tim@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: inline asm with sse problem
- From: wojtekb82_23 <wojtekb82_23@xxxxx>
- Re: constants question
- From: Lars Poeschel <larsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ld: Error: Overflow detected in relocation value
- From: Mike Welsen <mikewelsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Building gcc-4.2.3
- From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
- Building gcc-4.2.3
- From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimiziation questions (c++)
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: inline asm with sse problem
- From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- inline asm with sse problem
- From: wojtekb82_23 <wojtekb82_23@xxxxx>
- Problem Executing Application Beginning at gcc Version 4.1.3
- From: Marshall Lake <mlake@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dot product optimization
- From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- dot product optimization
- From: Robert Henning <developer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 64-bit for OS kernel development
- From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- "R_386_GOTOFF relocation" on x86-solaris2.10 with native ld and GNU as
- From: Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: "expected primary-expression before..." errors
- From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: "expected primary-expression before..." errors
- From: "Jim Stapleton" <stapleton.41@xxxxxxxxx>
- Debugging "no rule to make" messages
- From: "Ian S. Worthington" <ianworthington@xxxxxxx>
- Re: constants question
- From: Lars Poeschel <larsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Strange performance behaviour
- From: Harald Grossauer <harald.grossauer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- constants question
- From: Lars Poeschel <larsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- unknown directives
- From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: "expected primary-expression before..." errors
- From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
- "expected primary-expression before..." errors
- From: "Jim Stapleton" <stapleton.41@xxxxxxxxx>
- [SOLVED] Problem building gcc on solaris9: no rule to make target "all" in gcc-objects/gcc
- From: Paul Duquennoy <paul.duquennoy@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Development]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
