GCC Help

• Thread Index

• Re: Help Ragarding the table of contents
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Help Ragarding the table of contents
  • From: Abbas Chunawala <abbas.chunawala@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to use AddressSanitizer of gcc-4.8 on Arm target
  • From: "Jungsoo Son" <jungsoo.son@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: Method call and calling convention
  • From: Tom Tromey <tromey@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: Method call and calling convention
  • From: Tom Tromey <tromey@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: Problem calling C .dll library from Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
  • From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Problem calling C .dll library from Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
  • From: Pietro Ghillani <ghillo.p@xxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Method call and calling convention
  • From: Kifa The Great <kifathegreat@xxxxxxxxx>
• LTO : how to specify number of chunks with option -flto-partition=balanced
  • From: Swati Rathi <swatirathi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: SVN checkout failure
  • From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Potentially bogus warning about anonymous types
  • From: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need to know the reason why GCC able to compile
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Need to know the reason why GCC able to compile
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: SVN checkout failure
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• SVN checkout failure
  • From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Request
  • From: fomengia glen <gfomengia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Potentially bogus warning about anonymous types
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Potentially bogus warning about anonymous types
  • From: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
• gcc trunk bootstrap fails on darwin with linker assertion
  • From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: #num line directives suppress warnings in C code?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• #num line directives suppress warnings in C code?
  • From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
• Re: passing glob an argument
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: extra information in rtx data structure.
  • From: "Viktor Pobedin" <viktor.pobedin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: passing glob an argument
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• MinGW targets & Large Precompiled Headers and 'cc1plus.exe' crash
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• VCG tool
  • From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: passing glob an argument
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• passing glob an argument
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• proposed docs for i386 modifiers for extended asm
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Simulated optimization -Og possible on <4.8 gcc?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extra information in rtx data structure.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with multilib paths in a Canadian build
  • From: "jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx" <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Richard Henderson <rth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
  • From: David Aldrich <David.Aldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
  • From: David Aldrich <David.Aldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
  • From: David Aldrich <David.Aldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
  • From: Charles Smith <cts.private@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• extra information in rtx data structure.
  • From: "Viktor Pobedin" <viktor.pobedin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Simulated optimization -Og possible on <4.8 gcc?
  • From: Gene Smith <gds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ignored optimization command
  • From: Gene Smith <gds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with multilib paths in a Canadian build
  • From: "jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx" <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Possible release date of GCC 4.8.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Possible release date of GCC 4.8.1
  • From: Beren Oguz <berenoguz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
  • From: Charles Smith <cts.private@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Stage 2 cc1 hang on AIX 7.1
  • From: Andy314 <andy314@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Stage 2 cc1 hang on AIX 7.1
  • From: Andy314 <andy314@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: "David P. Riedel" <driedel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: YuGiOhJCJ Mailing-List <yugiohjcj-mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Allan Kamau <kamauallan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Sylvia <xdwang_tju@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Strange errors linking libstdc++.so
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7.2 overhead of auto lambda expression
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.7.2 overhead of auto lambda expression
  • From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Where are the NON extended asm docs?
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linking with libs built on older gcc version
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• linking with libs built on older gcc version
  • From: saurabhjain <saurabh.jain2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: David Kirkby <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Bootstrap error
  • From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
• Re: C std question: while loop with two tests.
  • From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C std question: while loop with two tests.
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• C std question: while loop with two tests.
  • From: "Steve Ellcey " <sellcey@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: Jose-Marcio Martins <Jose-Marcio.Martins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• C Integers
  • From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: locking.h
  • From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: locking.h
  • From: Dan Hitt <dan.hitt@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: locking.h
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• locking.h
  • From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure failed for installing gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• configure failed for installing gcc
  • From: Brian Lee <brian.h.lee.90@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to install libdecnumber?
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to install libdecnumber?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• how to install libdecnumber?
  • From: "David P. Riedel" <driedel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
  • From: Paul Hansen <paul.hansen.name@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
  • From: Paul Hansen <paul.hansen.name@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: New target powerpc64 symbol collision
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• New target powerpc64 symbol collision
  • From: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
  • From: Paul Hansen <paul.hansen.name@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: iterators of a swapped std::list
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: iterators of a swapped std::list
  • From: Mihai Vasilian <grayasm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: iterators of a swapped std::list
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• iterators of a swapped std::list
  • From: Mihai Vasilian <grayasm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <ExtraLeveLInSoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.8 libgfortran build fail
  • From: David Johnson <da.johnson.a@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ compiler not found
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ compiler not found
  • From: Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ Compiler
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pthread option documentation
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• C++ Compiler
  • From: Scarlbc <scarlbc@xxxxxxxxx>
• pthread option documentation
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Compiling static and shared libraries
  • From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling static and shared libraries
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Compiling static and shared libraries
  • From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling static and shared libraries
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling static and shared libraries
  • From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [gcc-help] Cannot find "vms/chfdef.h" while cross-compiling gcc-4.8.0 for alpha
  • From: mehmet basaran <mehmetbasaran89@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
  • From: Daniel Janzon <daniel.janzon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
  • From: Daniel Janzon <daniel.janzon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <ExtraLeveLInSoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Generating gimple statements from pragma's
  • From: Julien Peeters <jj.peeters@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• [gcc accept invalid ?] copy volatile struct
  • From: Дмитрий Дьяченко <dimhen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC not found
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• C++ compiler not found
  • From: "Brummer, J, Mnr <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>" <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC not found
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC not found
  • From: "Brummer, J, Mnr <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>" <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How does "configure" and "cmake" determines the gcc's version?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How does "configure" and "cmake" determines the gcc's version?
  • From: Glen <cnglen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Plugin, pragmas and braces
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Binary literals in C++1y
  • From: Jeremiah Willcock <jewillco@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Low level file access
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Low level file access
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Low level file access
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• Kudos!
  • From: Nick <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reduction of logic to arithmetic
  • From: Ranganath kulkarni <kulkarni137@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Missed optimization when using a structure
  • From: Victor Stinner <victor.stinner@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compatibility with MSVC __thiscall?
  • From: whathaveyoudone@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: minix3
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• minix3
  • From: Roger Jowett <rogerjowett@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Plugin, pragmas and braces
  • From: Marco Lattuada <ml.lattuada@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: ketmar <ketmar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: ketmar <ketmar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Support of non-temporal stores on ia32/Core2?
  • From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@xxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Low level file access
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <ENThomas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Low level file access
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• Low level file access
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Multiarch vs Multilib documentations
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Finding the address of a function
  • From: Mihai Donțu <mihai.dontu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Finding the address of a function
  • From: MARGUINAUD Philippe <philippe.marguinaud@xxxxxxxx>
• Multiarch vs Multilib documentations
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• --exclude-libs and uninitialized variables
  • From: Srinivas Kommu <kommu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
  • From: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Profiling a dlopened library
  • From: Niklaus <niklaus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Compatibility with MSVC __thiscall?
  • From: whathaveyoudone@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• What is the c++11 steady_clock measuring?
  • From: Henrik Mannerström <henrik.mannerstrom@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: div>mode>3 library calls
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help required
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Help required
  • From: sonal <sonalr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm - what does this option do?
  • From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• extended asm - what does this option do?
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: div>mode>3 library calls
  • From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Bulk] Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Bulk] Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• div>mode>3 library calls
  • From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• div>mode>3 library calls
  • From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining PCH use
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining PCH use
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Determining PCH use
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
  • From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
  • From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
  • From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building Cross GCC 4.6.3 with sysroot.
  • From: Johan Karlsson <Johan.Karlsson@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Power/Energy Awareness in GCC
  • From: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC reuses stack slot in setjmp-calling function -- is it a bug or feature?
  • From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@xxxxxxxx>
• GCC reuses stack slot in setjmp-calling function -- is it a bug or feature?
  • From: Konstantin Vladimirov <konstantin.vladimirov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Cannot stat gcc/include-fixed/limits.h when installing GCC 4.7.2
  • From: "Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott" <pjm@xxxxxxx>
• Catch selecting on exception
  • From: Jan Šebetovský <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: "Bob Wyatt" <bwyatt_sub@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: "Bob Wyatt" <bwyatt_sub@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [#ILA-980211]: hey
  • From: "General" <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Are there an option to pass assembler option to lto wrapper?
  • From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@xxxxxxxxx>
• Are there an option to pass assembler option to lto wrapper?
  • From: Konstantin Vladimirov <konstantin.vladimirov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to require an extra register in define_split?
  • From: Terry Guo <flameroc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to require an extra register in define_split?
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• set operations on gcov output
  • From: Adam Crain <jadamcrain@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to require an extra register in define_split?
  • From: Terry Guo <flameroc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building recent gcc (4.8.0) fails
  • From: jayjwa <jayjwa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trampolines on Harvard architecture?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is the strong symbol in a shared library overridden by a weak symbol in a static library?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Why is the strong symbol in a shared library overridden by a weak symbol in a static library?
  • From: "Jie Jiang" <jiangjie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building recent gcc (4.8.0) fails
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building recent gcc (4.8.0) fails
  • From: jayjwa <jayjwa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trampolines on Harvard architecture?
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Trampolines on Harvard architecture?
  • From: James Bowman <jamesb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: R_X86_64_COPY bug
  • From: Fredrick Prashanth John Berchmans <fredrickprashanth@xxxxxxxxx>
• constexpr for C?
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: access specifiers & class inheritance
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: access specifiers & class inheritance
  • From: scalpel4k <scalpel4k@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: access specifiers & class inheritance
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• access specifiers & class inheritance
  • From: scalpel4k <scalpel4k@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-gate.so.1 not exist ?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-gate.so.1 not exist ?
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: R_X86_64_COPY bug
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: R_X86_64_COPY bug
  • From: Fredrick Prashanth John Berchmans <fredrickprashanth@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Alan Sayre <ansayre62@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: JonY <10walls@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: JonY <10walls@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: JonY <10walls@xxxxxxxxx>
• dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization based on CPU type or flags?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Hacked ipad ,hacked icloud, boviaword@xxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Patricio Calderon <boviaworld@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Bjorn Lindgren <nr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Bjorn Lindgren <nr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Bjorn Lindgren <nr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8 const vector<const string>
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8 const vector<const string>
  • From: "Wood, Tobias" <tobias.wood@xxxxxxxxx>
• "SSE register return with SSE disabled" for unused functionality
  • From: "Симеон Златарев" <simeon.zlatarev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization based on CPU type or flags?
  • From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@xxxxxxxxxx>
• optimization based on CPU type or flags?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Regexp in scan-assembler-not
  • From: "Paulo Matos" <pmatos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dlclose() with zero references does not call library destructor
  • From: Paweł Sikora <pluto@xxxxxxxx>
• Regexp in scan-assembler-not
  • From: "Paulo Matos" <pmatos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• dlclose() with zero references does not call library destructor
  • From: charles quarra <charllsnotieneningunputocorreo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Default Architecture
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Default Architecture
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Build GCC4.8 fail when make
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Build GCC4.8 fail when make
  • From: Jerry OELoo <oyljerry@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC-4.8.0 MinGW MIPS cross compiler build fails
  • From: Amir Gonnen <amirgonnen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: DWARF-4 : missing DW_TAG_typedef for anonymous structures in C++
  • From: Jan Smets <jan.smets@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building against another glibc
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building against another glibc
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building against another glibc
  • From: Booty Bootstrapper <e519154@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Which is the best language for high performance output..
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Which is the best language for high performance output..
  • From: "Dudley, David" <ddudley@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Which is the best language for high performance output..
  • From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Which is the best language for high performance output..
  • From: Norah Jones <nh.jones01@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ compilation error on gcc 4.4.6
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• DWARF-4 : missing DW_TAG_typedef for anonymous structures in C++
  • From: Jan Smets <jan.smets@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm and register clobbers
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm and register clobbers
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• extended asm and register clobbers
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: glibc will not compile with -flto
  • From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc
  • From: Alexpux <alexpux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Effects of Link Time Optimizations in Illegal Libraries
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: glibc will not compile with -flto
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Default include directories
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• glibc will not compile with -flto
  • From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
• GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc
  • From: Алексей Павлов <alexpux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
  • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
  • From: David Abdurachmanov <david.abd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Effects of Link Time Optimizations in Illegal Libraries
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO)
  • From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@xxxxxx>
• LTO_tags out of range: Range is 0 to 365, value is 1432
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Default include directories
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Default include directories
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
  • From: ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
  • From: nagarjun <nagarjunreddy.iit@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: :: not recognized in 4.1.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
  • From: nagarjun <nagarjunreddy.iit@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: :: not recognized in 4.1.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• :: not recognized in 4.1.1
  • From: chinhow <how_lim82@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libstdc++ concept checking
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• atoimic type variants
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• libstdc++ concept checking
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct use of "-flto"
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Correct use of "-flto"
  • From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• lto-wrapper failure in GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Matt Godbolt <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO)
  • From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@xxxxxx>
• Re: Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH
  • From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH
  • From: Martin Corino <mcorino@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct use of "-flto"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8.0 on SPARC/Solaris 10 test issues
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Another question re asm constraints
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO)
  • From: gcc_mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Correct use of "-flto"
  • From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
• Re: about inline
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: about inline
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• 4.8.0 on SPARC/Solaris 10 test issues
  • From: Steven Christensen <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH
  • From: Martin Corino <mcorino@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Another question re asm constraints
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 compile with lto
  • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both.
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: about inline
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8.0 compile with lto
  • From: gcc_mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Symbol visibility and namespace
  • From: Dániel Varga <vargad88@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: about inline
  • From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: about inline
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8.0 bootstrap fails on darwin with linker assertion
  • From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@xxxxxxxxx>
• about inline
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both.
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::wstring_convert
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11
  • From: "C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP" <cjac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• std::wstring_convert
  • From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11
  • From: "C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP" <cjac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian)
  • From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian)
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian)
  • From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC and Intel Xeon Phi (Intel MIC) support
  • From: Bharath Ramesh <bramesh@xxxxxx>
• Re: RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC and Intel Xeon Phi (Intel MIC) support
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• GCC and Intel Xeon Phi (Intel MIC) support
  • From: Bharath Ramesh <bramesh@xxxxxx>
• Re: RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: char* to string: Differences between v4.4.5 and v4.6.1
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: char* to string: Differences between v4.4.5 and v4.6.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Error in make building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <ExtraLeveLInSoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• char* to string: Differences between v4.4.5 and v4.6.1
  • From: Alexander Striffeler <a.striffeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gprof: derivation of the uncertainty/error result
  • From: David Flater <dflater@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: building gcc on slackware64 14
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• 4.8.0 RC odd messages in stage 1 : objdump: command not found
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.7.2 guality faults in slackware14 but not 13 AMD64
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 released ?
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• building gcc on slackware64 14
  • From: "B.S.J.W. Stephenson" <es018r6256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 released ?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.8.0 released ?
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Regarding the alignment limit of the alignas specifier
  • From: "Emil 'Skeen' Madsen" <skeen@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
  • From: Andrew Chi <achi@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Builtin int128 on gcc-4.7
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
  • From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Builtin int128 on gcc-4.7
  • From: AlexVi <avinokur@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -flto with -g
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• -flto with -g
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
  • From: Andrew Chi <achi@xxxxxxx>
• Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory.
  • From: zero modulo <zeromodulo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: internel of new operator
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• internel of new operator
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help building shared library: EXPORT preprocessor definition
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: programme header
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ compilation error on gcc 4.4.6
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory.
  • From: zero modulo <zeromodulo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrapping new architectures with C++
  • From: Sam Thursfield <sam.thursfield@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Help building shared library: EXPORT preprocessor definition
  • From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrapping new architectures with C++
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help building shared library: EXPORT preprocessor definition
  • From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
• Bootstrapping new architectures with C++
  • From: Sam Thursfield <sam.thursfield@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
  • From: Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>
• g++ compilation error on gcc 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Extending gcc-4.5
  • From: Hayder <hayder.alkhalissi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory.
  • From: zero modulo <zeromodulo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Getting GCC to target Windows RT
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Getting GCC to target Windows RT
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Minimum debug options?
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
  • From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what does this mean?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
  • From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Getting GCC to target Windows RT
  • From: "Nathan K. Ladwig (Netham45)" <netham45@xxxxxxxxx>
• Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
  • From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
• programme header
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: issues with gcc 4.4.6
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• what does this mean?
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Minimum debug options?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Minimum debug options?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
  • From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Automatic accessor function inlining
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Minimum debug options?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Automatic accessor function inlining
  • From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
• Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking
  • From: Cosimo Caproni <cosimocaproni@xxxxxx>
• Automatic accessor function inlining
  • From: LRN <lrn1986@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
  • From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
  • From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
  • From: Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
  • From: Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
  • From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
• gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
  • From: Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Application receives SIGILL
  • From: OBD <1billiondolts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Application receives SIGILL
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does not RVO work in this case?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: httpd startup error
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• httpd startup error
  • From: andyroo <asmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Application receives SIGILL
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Application receives SIGILL
  • From: OBD <1billiondolts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Why does not RVO work in this case?
  • From: Henrik Mannerström <henrik.mannerstrom@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Function with two or more entry point
  • From: sztfg@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Function with two or more entry point
  • From: sztfg@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Function with two or more entry point
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Function with two or more entry point
  • From: James Bowman <jamesb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Function with two or more entry point
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Function with two or more entry point
  • From: sztfg@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc
  • From: Tim Schumacher <schumact@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: need help on 4.4.6
  • From: Michael Eager <eager@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: need help on 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
  • From: Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
  • From: Pedro Alves <palves@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
  • From: <Heiko.Papenfuss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
  • From: <Heiko.Papenfuss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
  • From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
  • From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
  • From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Bad Register Number for libgcc
  • From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
  • From: Pedro Alves <palves@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: help building 4.7.1
  • From: "Koenig, Mark (ISS SCI - Plano, TX)" <mark.koenig3@xxxxxx>
• Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
  • From: Pedro Alves <palves@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help building 4.7.1
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
  • From: Pedro Alves <palves@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help building 4.7.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• help building 4.7.1
  • From: "Koenig, Mark (ISS SCI - Plano, TX)" <mark.koenig3@xxxxxx>
• Re: need help on 4.4.6
  • From: Michael Eager <eager@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ member function .at() for arrays
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: need help on 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: need help on 4.4.6
  • From: Michael Eager <eager@xxxxxxxxxx>
• need help on 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Aw: Re: Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
  • From: gcc_mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Aw: Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
  • From: gcc_mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
• compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
  • From: "Daniel Albers" <Daniel.Albers@xxxxxxx>
• RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cross compiling stage 1 libgcc fails
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
  • From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
  • From: <Heiko.Papenfuss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: issues with gcc 4.4.6
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
  • From: <Heiko.Papenfuss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• issues with gcc 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Separate CFLAGS for libgcc?
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• LTO error in gcc-trunk
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi
  • From: Bela Markus <bmarkus@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected
  • From: Michele Martone <michele.martone@xxxxxxxxxx>