Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] generic/1229: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 09:22:30AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 07:42:50PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> > Stress file with atomic writes to ensure we excercise codepaths
> > where we are mixing different FS operations with atomic writes
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hrm, doesn't generic/521 test this already if the fs happens to support
> atomic writes?
> 
> --D

Hi Darrick,

Yes but I wanted one with _require_scratch_write_atomic and writes going
to SCRATCH fs to explicitly test atomic writes as that can get missed in
g/521. 

Would you instead prefer to have those changes in g/521?

Regards,
Ojaswin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux