On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 08:38:22AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:04:51PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote: > > This test is intended to ensure that multi blocks atomic writes > > maintain atomic guarantees across sudden FS shutdowns. > > > > Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tests/generic/772 | 360 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tests/generic/772.out | 2 + > > 2 files changed, 362 insertions(+) > > create mode 100755 tests/generic/772 > > create mode 100644 tests/generic/772.out > > > > diff --git a/tests/generic/772 b/tests/generic/772 > > new file mode 100755 > > index 00000000..6af7e74c > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tests/generic/772 > > @@ -0,0 +1,360 @@ > > +#! /bin/bash > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +# Copyright (c) 2025 IBM Corporation. All Rights Reserved. > > +# > > +# FS QA Test 0772 > > +# > > +# Test multi block atomic writes with sudden FS shutdowns to ensure > > +# the FS is not tearing the write operation > > +. ./common/preamble > > +. ./common/atomicwrites > > +_begin_fstest auto atomicwrites > > + > > +_require_scratch_write_atomic_multi_fsblock > > +_require_atomic_write_test_commands > > _require_shutdown? > > Otherwise seems fine to me... > > --D Will do, thanks for the reviews! Regards, ojaswin
