On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 07:46:00AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 05:11:34PM +0800, Ma Xinjian wrote: > > From: Xinjian Ma <maxj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This test uses xfs_scrub which is an EXPERIMENTAL and unstable feature. > > Add _require_scrub to check if the system supports it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xinjian Ma <maxj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Oops, thanks for the correction. > Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> Experimental has meen removed from scrub in 6.16, is this still needed? > > --D > > > --- > > tests/xfs/603 | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/603 b/tests/xfs/603 > > index 04122b55..d6058a3e 100755 > > --- a/tests/xfs/603 > > +++ b/tests/xfs/603 > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ _require_xfs_db_command iunlink > > # until after the directory repair code was merged > > _require_xfs_io_command repair -R directory > > _require_scratch_nocheck # repair doesn't like single-AG fs > > +_require_scrub > > > > # From the AGI definition > > XFS_AGI_UNLINKED_BUCKETS=64 > > -- > > 2.49.0 > > > > >
