Re: proposal: move "Image size requirements" release criterion from Beta to Final

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 5:52 PM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Another +1, this makes perfect sense.

Thanks everyone for your feedback. I'll wait a few more days and then implement it.
 
While we're on the topic, we should also consider bumping the netinst
limit generally to 1.2G. Several netinst images are currently over the
1G limit for F43 and these will be blockers if nothing changes. I'm not
super jazzed about trying to stuff them back under 1G right now, dunno
if anyone else is.

We should probably poke Server SIG about Server netinst. Who owns the Everything netinst?

Furthermore, it's a bit annoying to see a flood of errors on each installation template, because lots of Spins are oversize. It is then hard to spot the important errors:

We could either disable size checking for spins in general (they don't block release anyway), or disable it at least for those who clearly don't care about the size limit (being half a gig over the limit means they don't care, in my eyes).
-- 
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux