https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790 --- Comment #39 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Okay, f39 workarounds are no longer necessary, but the package could be still useful! Alternatives might have been somehow controversial, removed them also. The package would offer only yqp and xqp. If you want it as yq or xq, make symlink or alias in your home. Although basic syntax can be compatible, the output is not the same by default. Differences are not subtle enough, even though the alternatives were just extra, optional subpackage. I have tried to fix most of Miro's comments. The spec is more lightweight now, minimalistic. Spec URL: https://github.com/pemensik/yq/raw/fedora/python-yq.spec SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-yq-3.4.3-15.fc41.src.rpm Github changes: https://github.com/pemensik/yq/blob/fedora/python-yq.spec Anyone still wants to review this request? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202263790%23c39 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
